Passing Strange Explores Questions of Identity

Aaron Reed looks a bit awkward when he first takes the stage in the musical Passing Strange at The Studio Theater (through August 8). Reed plays a young Stew, the singer-songwriter behind the band The Negro Problem, in this musical about his life. (No worries--I hadn't heard of Stew either until Passing Strange premiered on Broadway last year). Passing Strange covers the period of Stew's creative germination, from the time he leaves his LA home as a teenager through his travels in Amsterdam and Berlin. When Reed first emerges, he plays the role of the uncertain teenager perfectly. He argues with his mother about not going to church, and needing to "find himself." But Reed's affected, whiny speaking voice transforms into a robust baritone when he sings. Halfway through the first half, Stew gets his wish and leaves for Amsterdam.

Stew undergoes the typical young adult trials of love and drugs. Meanwhile, his mother (Deidra LaWan Starnes) implores him to return home. Naturally, Stew ignores these wishes and continues his adventures on to Berlin in the second act.

Narrating throughout is the appropriately named character, "Narrator." Played by Stew himself in the Broadway production, this figure can also be thought of as an older Stew looking back on his life. He is expertly portrayed by Jahi Kearse in this production. The Narrator doubles as part of the band, and serves as a tongue-in-cheek link between the fiction of the stage and the reality of the audience. He makes many comments pointing out the fact that we're watching a performance.

Most importantly, the Narrator allows The Studio Theatre to adopt a minimalist approach to Passing Strange. The Narrator can tell us what city Stew's in without any fancy sets. Studio Theatre's Stage 4 is hardly even a stage. The raised platform is only a few feet--just enough room for Stew's mother to perch when she is singing from LA.The ensemble roams about the floor at the same level as the audience. Actually, we are higher because of the stadium seating. By stripping away all gratuitous flourishes, this approach forces audiences to connect with the actors. We can focus on the story and Stew's dilemmas. The jokes are also more heartfelt when close up. When Stew explains why he can't go home to see her, his mother responds "Your deep concern for yourself is really moving."

Though it covers some traditional themes, Passing Strange is no cliched bildungsroman. It also deals with issues of black identity and reality in art. When Stew is in Berlin he embraces the impoverished black American as his true self. He tells everyone that he grew up in the ghetto, where he dealt with hate every day. An ironic duet then ensues with Stew telling these stories of woe juxtaposed with his mother's stories of the American dream. "What will I do alone in my big two story house?" she sings as Stew tries to paint a portrait of himself as someone who grew up in a crack house.

Passing Strange explores authenticity without shoving it down out throats. The questions of what make's Stew's identity authentic are asked, but not fully resolved. The Narrator wryly remarks "Aren't you shocked when you find out that your life was determined by the decisions of a teenager?" We can all relate to those moments when you think of how different you are from previous years. Sometimes it takes years--more years than the period covered in Passing Strange--to figure out what one's identity truly is.

Fabulousness at The Studio Theatre

Since it was pay-what-you-can day at The Studio Theatre today, Maria and I decided to take a chance on Legends!, Studio's latest production. We weren't sure what to expect, given that the website promises "Epic catfights," "Unparalleled style," but not much plot summary. Contextualization was not a problem. The play opens with an agent making a call to "Brad Pitt." Through their brief conversation, we glean that the producer is trying to get two divas who hate each other on the same stage for a show called Legends! In this production, the two legends are Leatrice Monsee (John Epperson, aka Lypsinka) and Sylvia Glenn (James Lecesne), each played by a man in drag.

After the producer calls Sylvia pretending to be Brad Pitt, she comes around and arranges a meeting with Leatrice. Of course, Sylvia--as befits her has been status--doesn't actually have a nice apartment, so she borrows her friend's. The apartment comes with a maid, Aretha (the first reference of many), who gets compelled to participate in Sylvia's scheme.

This set-up pretty much says it all about the play's farcical approach. The next 75 minutes or so are filled with campy moments and catty banter between Leatrice and Sylvia. Over the top fanfare and spotlights mark each lady's entrance. Once on stage, they accuse one another of devilish conniving. Leatrice jabs at Sylvia's seven husbands, and Sylvia fights back by threatening to reveal Leatrice's food stamp status. The source of their grudge is their jealousy of each other's roles. Sylvia is consistently typecast as the bitch, while Leatrice is consistently typecast as the heroine who endures and endures. Naturally, the two women have more in common than they'd like to admit. We learn that both women are near-destitute because of former boyfriends/husbands. They are both Oscar winners who refuse to do less glamorous work.

But whether or not Leatrice and Sylvia can come together over these similarities is besides the point of this production. Legends! is pure entertainment. Halfway through the show, a male stripper named Boom-Boom shows up. Originally hired to do a bachelorette party in the apartment for Aretha's niece, he didn't get the message that the party was off. The audience is then treated to a full strip number where Boom-Boom takes everything off, leaving only a top hat to save the audience from male frontal nudity. Lypsinka treats us to a lip-syncing number towards the end as well. The finale, featuring a fun song and dance duet with the two divas, appropriately closes the lighthearted romp.

Labute Explores Vanity at Studio Theatre

When I rented The Shape of Things several years ago, back when the local rental store was still in business, I thought I was in for a nice, relaxing romantic comedy. Starring Rachel Weisz and Paul Rudd, I knew it would not be entirely vapid either. But by the end of the movie, I wished that I had rented Clueless instead for my dose of Paul Rudd. Instead of being the typical feel-good rom-com, this movie written by Neil Labute provides a stark look at how vanity leads to cruelty. Rachel Weisz plays an art student with whom Paul Rudd falls in love at the beginning of the movie. Thanks to her artistic talents, he goes from rattily dressed professor to sharply dressed dandy. The film's denouement, however, reveals that Weisz's character is using Rudd's in a twisted act of manipulation. I finished the movie feeling despondent, as if I had been tricked as well.

And so I was prepared to see the same kind of cruelty spotlighted in Neil Labute's play, reasons to be pretty in its closing fortnight at the Studio Theatre. (Yes, it insists on lowercase representation.) The conclusion of a trilogy that includes The Shape of Things and Fat Pig, reasons to be pretty does touch on the theme of American's obsession with the superficial, and its undesirable consequences. The play opens with Steph yelling at her boyfriend Greg for telling other people that he thinks her face is ugly. Steph (Margot White) knows this because her best friend Carly (Teresa Stephenson) overheard Greg (Ryan Artzberger) talking to Carly's husband Kent (Thom Miller). After arguing with Greg over what he did or didn't say, Steph ultimately breaks up with him. This scene terrifically asks who the vain one really is - Greg for making a appearance focused remark, or Steph for taking it so much to heart?

In the meantime, Carly and Kent are having their own troubles surrounding vanity. Kent is the stereotypical macho jerk who's cheating on Carly with "the new girl." All we know is that she has a fantastic face, even though Carly is already a knock-out. One joke in this play is "My dad always said, find a hot girl, and you'll find a man who's tired of fucking her." Kent soon involves Greg to deceive Carly. Greg ultimately has control of whether or not Carly finds out. In the scenes where he's alone with Carly because they both work at the same place, we wonder how much responsibility Greg has for Kent's actions. And we wonder how far Carly wants to go to deceive herself.

But Labute is most interested in the origins and purpose of vanity. Though we may think all the characters are shallow for protecting their bruised egos, Labute shows that this obsession with the exterior may be a manifestation of how one feels on the interior. This idea is most fully explored in a final scene when Steph confides in Greg that she wanted him to be someone who would put a ring on her finger, and take care of her. Unfortunately, it took four years of being with him to realize that he would not be able to provide those things. In this moment of confession, we wonder if the "ugly" comment sealed the deal for Steph, or if it was on some level an excuse for her to leave Greg. Did she hurt herself by giving up so easily, or save herself by leaving when she did? The extent to which superficial concerns actually drive decision making is a question that Labute leaves unanswered.

American Buffalo doesn't Buffalo

Saturday's performance of American Buffalo at the Studio Theatre was my first introduction to "Mametspeak," David Mamet's brand of dialogue. Mamet, a playwright known for Glengarry Glen Ross, Speed-the-plow, and American Buffalo, writes characters who use crude language to mask their insecurities.

The two main characters of American Buffalo, Don and Teach, fling around "fuck," "cunt," and political incorrect slurs whenever they get the chance. After all, they have little control over the other aspects of their lives. The play opens in Don's scrap metal shop. He has just lost $200 the night before in a game of cards. He has also just sold a buffalo nickel for much less than what he thinks it was worth. Though Don maintains a commanding exterior, these two losses clearly still weigh on his mind.

His younger, feeble-minded assistant, Bob, tells Don that the wealthy man who bought the buffalo nickel has just left down. Don throws around the idea of breaking into the coin man's house and stealing the nickel back. Meanwhile, Teach, a slick, leather jacket type, has entered the stage cursing out some women who disrespected him with a snide comment. Once he gets wind of Don and Bob's plan, Teach tries to reclaim his respectability by taking over the robbery plan. He convinces Don to drop Bob. Though Don originally feels buffaloed by the coin collector, the rest of the play forces us to ask who is really buffaloing who here as it explores the consequences of Don's decision to sacrifice Bob's loyalty for potential riches.

Written and set in the mid-70's, during our last serious recession, American Buffalo is a very timely pick for the Studio Theatre today. Don and Teach's insecurities surrounding their masculinity reminds me of the vandalism committed by a laid-off neighbor in a recent Dexter episode.

In the Studio Theatre's intimate theatre-in-the-round environment, these insecurities were even more palpable than if the play was performed on a traditional stage. Sitting extremely closely to the actors, I could see the emotion on their faces--Don's quivering jowls, Teach's hurt pride--clearly without the aid of inches of make-up. Such proximity also made the show one that I won't easily forget.