The Ask Questions Social Class in America

The Slate Culture Gabfest is discussing Sam Lipsyte's new novel, The Ask, next week as part of its first live show in New York City. Loyal listener that I am, I picked up this novel and was immediately surprised to find that cultually-minded Slate readers are both the target audience and the target of its biting satire.
The Ask's central character is a university development officer, Milo Burke. The book opens with him losing his job after telling off a development student. But when Purdy Stuart, a billionaire and Milo's college housemate, becomes a potential "ask" for the development office, the university hires Milo back. Milo soon realizes that working Purdy for a donation means working for Purdy, as Milo gets enlisted in a series of unsavory tasks for his ask.

Meanwhile, Milo's not doing so well on the home front either. He lives in Queens, which is the closest to Manhattan that he and his wife can afford. His wife, Maura, is a sometimes lesbian who may or may not be having an affair with a male coworker who may or may not be gay.

What makes Milos situation more pathetic is his self-awareness. Written in first person, Milo's witty sarcasm reveals the derailment of the American dream. He sees himself as a loser. Purdy's accountant scolds Milo, "For heaven's sake, the system's rigged for white men and you still can't tap in." Indeed, Milo does feel like someone who once had opportunity, and now doesn't. He admits, "Maybe I wasn't going anywhere...I had always been bitter, was still bitter, was bitter about the bitterness." He tells us about the the story of a stay-at-home dad neighbor who was a chef. When Milo read that the chef and his young family died in a car accident, Milo feels an empathic sense of relief. "He would never go down in history, or case history, as a shitty father. Whereas me, I still had a decent shot." But it isn't clear if Milo's failure is simply due to Milo's lack of trying or to a larger, systemic American problem.

But Milo isn't only pointing out a flaw in his life trajectory; it's also a flaw in the trajectory of the thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of Bachelor's in Liberal Arts toting, wannabe artist twenty-somethings who flooded New York City over the past decade, only to become disillusioned thirty somethings who have resigned themselves to real jobs. When the novel opens, Milo reflects on the disdain he says for the privileged students who squander their parents money at his university. But then he realizes "I'd been just like these wretches once. Now they stared through me, as though I were merely some drone in their sight line...They were right. That's exactly what I was."

As Milo's story moves forward, he also takes us back to moments of opportunity in the past, and how he never took advantage of them. For instance, after college, Purdy actually asked Milo to become involved in an online music store. Milo brushed this off to work on his painting. Soon enough, Purdy sold his store for hundreds of millions; Milo didn't sell any paintings.

Milo and others' bitterness comes across as a rant against America. His coworker, Horace, opens the novel ranting, "America...was a run-down and demented pimp. Our republic's whoremaster days were through...We're the bitches of the First World." America's a bitch because Americans were either bitches or bitch masters. Milo sees himself in the bitch category, serving Purdy in his quest to cover up the existence of a twenty-something son who lost his legs in Iraq and is now determined to get what's his from Purdy. Though I found myself classifying each character as either servant or served, I started to realize that this book isn't exactly about such clear divisions. Each character has some limitations in their opportunities, no matter how wealthy they started out their lives. In addition, Milo's life isn't all that shitty compared to others in the novel. Milo has no skills, squandered his time as an artist, and still managed to get a cushy job, after all. Milo is a sympathetic character, but is also the butt of the joke. Instead of beating down on America, Lipsyte suggests there is still hope yet. It's not about the class into which one is born, but what they do with it once there.

The Privileges: Rags to Riches in the Twenty-first Century

Jonathan Dee's new book, The Privileges, has been paired with other novels about money and the 2009 economic collapse in recent reviews. This seems like a logical choice for a novel that traces the lives of Adam and Cynthia Morey, an extremely attractive couple who quickly rises to the upper echelons of Manhattan wealth after getting married at the age of 22. The Moreys (think more + money) are a couple that inspires envy and hate. Blessed with two beautiful children, they are also favored by Adam's wealthy boss, allowing Adam to become fabulously wealthy--seemingly without--any work.

About ten years into the marriage, Adam becomes involved in a classic insider trading scheme. But the story doesn't end here. Dee doesn't take Adam down. The point is not to show how wealth leads to greed. Instead, Dee lets Adam walk away without criminal prosecution, and go on to leave a productive life in New York high society. The point is to show how greed leads to wealth.

This is because, at its heart, The Privileges has more in common with The Great Gatsby than with The Bonfire of the Vanities. Like Gatsby, the Moreys embrace the wholly American definition of success. Like Gatsby, the Moreys are also driven by love; in this case, their "epic love" for each other, as their son puts it, pushes them forward. Most importantly, like Gatsby, the Moreys are determined to free themselves of the shackles of their histories. Adam and Cynthia come from middle class backgrounds, from parents whom they refuse to ever acknowledge. Though we meet Mr. Morey at Adam and Cynthia's wedding, we don't hear about his again until Adam is forced to tell his firm that his father is dead. The silence is painful when Adam fails to understand his colleague's shocked expressions. As far as Adam is concerned, his father has nothing to do with his current identity as a rainmaking venture capitalist.

No - the Moreys are not likable. Dee uses free indirect style to show us how Adam and Cynthia think. They are disdainful of anyone who hangs on to their pasts or acts based on nostalgia. Cynthia's stepsister accuses her of raising two spoiled children. Maybe she should withhold things from time to time, she suggests. Cynthia silently laughs at this idea; what's the point of imposing hardship on children simply to replicate some romantic notion?

While Cynthia and Adam remain flat throughout the novel, the only dynamic character who's morality is at stake is their son, Jonas. He is into indie music, art, and actually gets along with Cynthia's stepsister. The novel's climax involves a moment when Jonas has to decide if he'll pursue and interest in art and history, or focus on living in the present, with eyes set on the future like his parents.

Throughout, Dee creates a tension in the reader. We are at once jealous and horrified at the Moreys. On the one hand, we want to be like them; so forward looking and unburdened by the past. On the other hand, we pity them for their myopia -- their inability to see how their lives lack meaning and create a destructive path. To be or not to be like the Moreys? It's up to us to decide.